(no subject)
Aug. 9th, 2004 10:43 amDora Goss is discussing, in a casual sort of way, if hollywood would allow for a Hellgirl--ie, large, conventionally unattractive, red, etc. I suppose the closest I can think of is Shrek, where the heroine is rewarded properly for her behavior--I love fairy tales, but I hate when the reward for acting properly is the removal of the obstacle that doesn't exist anymore. Beauty and the Beast--the Beast is rewarded for being a lovable type person by being returned to his original form, yes, but Beauty, who has learned to look below the skin and love people for who they truly are is given a human boyfriend again. Even though that's not what her lesson was, even though that's not who she fell in love with. There's another one I get even more annoyed with for that reason, but I can't think of it at the moment.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-09 08:01 am (UTC)Well, I am sure he missed his manual dexterity a little...
Date: 2004-08-09 08:02 am (UTC)Re: Well, I am sure he missed his manual dexterity a little...
Date: 2004-08-09 08:11 am (UTC)Re: Well, I am sure he missed his manual dexterity a little...
Date: 2004-08-09 03:35 pm (UTC)Ah, but only villainesses can be ugly
Date: 2004-08-09 08:01 am (UTC)I remember back in the days of She-Ra noticing the discrepancy between the overt and underlying messages. You see, they kept having "message" episodes about how beauty isn't important and just because someone is ugly does not mean they are bad.
Except, the way the showed that character X wasn't evil after all? Why, she turns pretty at the end!
Um. Hello mixed messages.
Re: Ah, but only villainesses can be ugly
Date: 2004-08-09 08:17 am (UTC)Re: Ah, but only villainesses can be ugly
Date: 2004-08-09 08:18 am (UTC)Beasts
Date: 2004-08-10 08:54 am (UTC)