Valentines day.
Feb. 13th, 2003 02:34 amWhat really gets me about it isn't just the artificiality of it, but the homogenous nature of this artificial holiday. You get someone *red roses* because that's the flower you give on V-day. You buy her heart shaped boxes of drug store chocolate, because that's the candy you give. I want violets and a Lake Champlain Raspberry Truffle bar. Do you know how hard it would be to find violets now? do you know how much effort that would mean Mr. X had spent on me? As opposed to the flower that says "I didn't care enough to actually find out what your favorite flower is" And let's face it. No one's favorite flowers are scentless red rosebuds that will never bloom but rather wilt pathetically within a day.
The way I figure, you have three options for Vday. Tacky, which involves a leather rose and a bag of M&Ms. Thoughtful, which involves the flowers they like, the chocolate they like, perhaps a thoughtful gift that they will like. Or just being sweet to them same as you would any other day, just because they deserve sweetness.
Me? I have no one special to be thoughtful or sweet to me. my mother however seems to have tacky covered but good. (my mother's motto: Tacky: it's not just for glue anymore.) She's found me another valentine's animal from Walmart. Last year was a pink elephant. The year before was a fuzzy rhino with a heart stuck to his hip.
And really, I don't need a holiday to tell me I'm alone, and I don't need a holiday to tell me this is wrong. I'm not delighted to be single, I'm quite often lonely, but that's my business, not the holiday's. And maybe I wouldn't be quite so lonely if I wasn't being told so often that I should be lonely. Though I think probably I would be. The cat just doesnt' cut it, I want someone I can tell about the day I had and all that.
The way I figure, you have three options for Vday. Tacky, which involves a leather rose and a bag of M&Ms. Thoughtful, which involves the flowers they like, the chocolate they like, perhaps a thoughtful gift that they will like. Or just being sweet to them same as you would any other day, just because they deserve sweetness.
Me? I have no one special to be thoughtful or sweet to me. my mother however seems to have tacky covered but good. (my mother's motto: Tacky: it's not just for glue anymore.) She's found me another valentine's animal from Walmart. Last year was a pink elephant. The year before was a fuzzy rhino with a heart stuck to his hip.
And really, I don't need a holiday to tell me I'm alone, and I don't need a holiday to tell me this is wrong. I'm not delighted to be single, I'm quite often lonely, but that's my business, not the holiday's. And maybe I wouldn't be quite so lonely if I wasn't being told so often that I should be lonely. Though I think probably I would be. The cat just doesnt' cut it, I want someone I can tell about the day I had and all that.
no subject
Date: 2003-02-13 12:11 am (UTC)But. Um. I actually really like roses. Have some in the yard at home growing out of control and all prickly when I try to hack them back. Being Hannah's plants, however, they've had to get with the what-doesn't-kill-you program.
no subject
Date: 2003-02-13 06:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-02-13 06:57 am (UTC)Have you considered this might be part of the reason boyfriends are hard to find? :P
no subject
Date: 2003-02-13 10:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-02-13 12:30 am (UTC)Heh. Yay for my Clint.
Anyway, you can celebrate Hatemonger's Day if you like. ;p
no subject
Date: 2003-02-13 07:19 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-02-13 09:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-02-13 03:00 am (UTC)I smashed the mug on the fire-escape railings when I got rid of him. It was very, very satisfying.
no subject
Date: 2003-02-13 06:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-02-13 04:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-02-13 06:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-02-13 08:41 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-02-14 05:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-02-13 07:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-02-13 09:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-02-13 12:48 pm (UTC)Umm. Sorry. Long day at work... I do like getting flowers though.
no subject
Date: 2003-02-13 04:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-02-13 08:43 am (UTC)I'm with you there. I'm tired of the media implying that I should be lonely without a boyfriend or husband. I'm tired of the implication that there is something wrong with me if I don't have someone to shower me with expensive, useless gifts for an articial holiday. I'm perfectly capable of feeling bad all on my own without the media and various other people pushing me.
just to be difficult
Date: 2003-02-13 09:11 am (UTC)Lots of guys, don't even know what romance is. This is their clue-by-four that they have to occasionally do something nice and romantic, that popcorn and football watching is not enough. And it even comes complete with clear instructions on the absolute minimum that they have to do.
And while it's hard to justify being sad that you don't get spontaneous little romantic surprises from your loved one, if he's such a schmuck that he doesn't even do it once a year, you have righteous indignation of a certified holiday on your side.
If you feel oppressed by Valentine's Day, that's what you're reading into it. All it really is is a big neon sign to people who are in love that they should put some effort out into making that clear. Of course it also reminds people who don't have a "valentine" that other people do have valentines, but how is that news?
Of course it's cheesy and homogenized, it's hallmark american culture. So? They do that to every holiday, they do that to every emotion, it doesn't make the emotions that are there any less real.
no subject
Date: 2003-02-13 09:49 am (UTC)However, as the years went on, we've slowed down. Plus, he gets laid pretty much whenever now, so there's no reason for that. Because that is the whole point of the holiday, isn't it? To fool your whomever into thinking you are thoughtful and romantic and cherish them above all others so that they can get some. Hmmm, maybe I am bitter about the holiday after all.
I bought LOTR valentines. V-Day HoYay!
no subject
Date: 2003-02-13 11:17 am (UTC)Though it is good for one thing. I now know that if I'm dating a guy who will buy me choclates for Valentine's so that he can eat half of them, or a piece of lingere not because I want it but because he wants to see me in it, yet he still considers that a "gift", then obviously he's a guy I should dump ASAP.
So I suppose it has the function of weeding out the losers...
And yes, I don't mind receiving nice red roses (especially the kind that have petals with deep red tops and silvery undersides, but I don't know what they're called), getting cheap red rosebuds because that's the default and the guy lacks enough imagination or thoughtfulness to come up with something better is a different matter entirely.
And I'd infinitely rather be with a guy who will spontaneously do something sweet and romantic because he wants to, than a guy who does something cliched for Valentine's because he knows he's supposed to and thinks he will "get in trouble" if he doesn't.
I'm thinking that any future S.O. and I may have to have an agreement that we ignore Valentine's altogether, and promise to pick some other random day and surprise the other person with something sweet and romantic.